step one. Yet ,, inside genealogy, everyone knowthat for every single signal there clearly was an exception to this rule. A good vexing section ofgenealogy is the fact no-one most understands just how to utilize the latest exceptions orrules that have any decisive adjective such as for instance always, maybe, most likely,more than likely, etcetera. It would be interesting in the event that there most other examples ofjointures are produced a year or two shortly after a well-known matrimony date.
dos. Could there be an extant dispensation towards marriage out of ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes who had been third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh otherwise next cousins, after taken off the fresh 5th LordClifford? That would restrict the wedding date.
Arthur
Presumably, if the an excellent dispensation is sought and you can offered, it would havebeen from the one of several following the, and can even can be found in the brand new correspondingregister publication, if it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop away from York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out-of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop from Carlisle 1509-1520
5. When your tenth Lord Clifford do marry at the beginning of 1487 [state January] andhas Elizabeth after in that seasons, do the brand new varför inte prova dessa? chronology maybe not really works?
John palms?
Age created in late 1487, Henry produced in 1488/9, Joan within the ,an such like. filling out the new brands of your upload out-of . If the (a) thechronology nonetheless work; and (b) their own marriage part wasn’t reduced; thenwe simply have the latest 1505 pedigree out of Henry VII’s that is within the oppositionto the supposition one she is actually a valid child.
6. Regarding the 1505 pedigree: Are the Clifford daughters the fresh new onlyknown Henry VII connections excluded? Are there anyone else? In that case,won’t you to echo defectively on this document because the a resource?
From evaluations I’ve made of the latest c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith the fresh new 1480-1500 Visitation of your North pedigrees, which happen to be
About c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, the newest Clifford children are not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but instead regarding St. John pedigree. Given that I’mnot accustomed new St. John members of the family, following ‘s the suggestions asit looks throughout the c.1505 pedigree, as taken from the newest 1834 Coll. Ideal. etGen. post. This new phrasing when you look at the quotations is precisely whilst seems inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).
“Zero. XII.”From my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Rod, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out of Somerset got around three husbands.” Of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My personal Woman the brand new King’s Mommy.” who had “Brand new Queen.” whohad “Prince “By the “Sir Oliver Saint John, basic spouse.” she had 3 daus & dos sons:
An excellent. “Edith, married in order to Geoffrey Rod away from Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married with the Lady Margaret, dau. of theDuke of Clarence.” They’d: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[an alternative youngster, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously four people:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Five daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you’re able to Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, married so you can Thomas Kent, Esq. out of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A great Nun regarding Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, married to Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his awesome brethren and you may sistren.” With issueindicated, not titled.C2. “Age, wedded to help you Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “Elizabeth, wedded basic towards Lord Zouche; once on the LordScrope regarding Bolton.” Issue:D1. [of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [by the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Which have issueindicated however called.
Margaret Duchess out of Somerset, from the “Lionel Lord Welles, history partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. away from K. Edward IV.” andthey had “E.”